RE: newsletters
by Freda Lockert <freda(at)rlockert.easynet.co.uk>
|
Date: |
Sat, 1 Jul 2000 02:51:58 +0100 |
To: |
shelleyw(at)home.com |
Cc: |
hwg-basics(at)hwg.org |
References: |
home |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Hi Shelley
You seem to have two conflicting requirements that can't be resolved,
not easily anyway. PDF is essentially a print technology that's been
grabbed by the web community to do a job it wasn't originally
designed for.
> I personally prefer to print off hard copies of items such as
>newsletters to read, although I will read email and most other
>information from the web on my screen. It's a terrible
>affliction - I'm a paper keeper :)
It's not an affliction, it's natural. We don't absorb relatively
complex information from a computer screen - there are a number of
factors that interfere with the reading process - limited view of the
document, screen clutter, glare, difficulty navigating the material,
lots of other things. Then there are different types of reading, all
of which will be employed in the complete process of reading a book,
newsletter, technical report, whatever. Scan first, note what
interests you most and read that, go back to a previous reference,
glance over the rest, maybe read it later after you've tackled more
urgent things, finally go back and read it all again in detail - you
can't do that on the computer screen. A behavioural scientist could
give you a far better description than I can.
>Visual recognition of a
>newsletter regardless of format is a preference in that the copy
>you download off the web is the "same" as the copy that is
>received via snailmail. (sheesh - I hope that made sense :) )
Certainly did - consistent brand image.
The only version you can read anywhere, any time, is the paper one.
Try relaxing in the bath and reading the electronic version.
Olav is right in that Word isn't a DTP package although MS claim it
is. I used to have to do 300+ page specifications for railway
engineering projects with it, that's when I found out that master and
subdocument, OLE, columns, and graphics handling are a sick joke. My
old employer is planning to use Word to create pages for the company
intranet (sigh). Adobe PageMaker gives a lot more control, options
and exports to PDF, at a reasonable cost, if that's the route you
have to take.
Regards.
Freda
.
--
'Never give up on what you know in your heart to be right. The world
needs you and your commitment, desperately' - John Denver.
http://www.thp.org
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA